Difference between revisions of "Installation and Integration/ActionItems"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JimStewart (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* Space inside needed to close the TCO | * Space inside needed to close the TCO | ||
| − | * TCO dimensions | + | * TCO dimensions: W between 1.1 and 1.2m H will depends on roof penetration (something like membrane to membrane - 0.7m) |
| + | * Bob Flight is a potential candidate after the reviews (~December) | ||
===Roof penetration locations=== | ===Roof penetration locations=== | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
* Detector readout feed thru | * Detector readout feed thru | ||
| − | ===Cable routing to the feedthroughs === | + | ===Cable routing to the feedthroughs --> [https://dune.bnl.gov/wiki/Installation_and_Integration/ActionItems/Cables cable_page]=== |
| − | There are two options for reading out the lower APA | + | There are two options for reading out the lower APA: |
| + | * Either the cables are routed up through the upper APA | ||
| + | * Along the floor and up the wall. | ||
| + | The floor option changes the number and location of the feedthrus. There are also grounding implications. | ||
| − | *'''-> | + | * Prototyping could be useful (trial at Ash River? The APA frame will get there between 7th-14th) |
| − | *'''-> | + | |
| + | *'''The info is from Lee''' | ||
| + | *'''-> Jim will set up a meeting with Roxanne/Marvin/Ron and Matt/Lee and Dave from photon to start the discussion''' | ||
| + | *'''->Need this around Xmass for final decision in mid-January''' | ||
===Floor loading=== | ===Floor loading=== | ||
| Line 42: | Line 49: | ||
Detector installation. | Detector installation. | ||
| − | I added info on the areal lift on the installation page. | + | I added info on the areal lift on the installation page. |
*'''-> Where is the info?''' | *'''-> Where is the info?''' | ||
| Line 50: | Line 57: | ||
===Plan for the work flow === | ===Plan for the work flow === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Understand the test required on the APA. Horizontal or Vertical. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Understand the work flow (row by row? section by section?) | ||
| + | |||
*'''-> Where is the info?''' | *'''-> Where is the info?''' | ||
*'''-> Who?''' | *'''-> Who?''' | ||
Latest revision as of 12:47, 7 November 2016
Action Items for the Installation and Integration group
1. Cryostat design
TCO interface
- List of the components using the TCO
- -> Where is the info?
- -> Who?
- Space inside needed to close the TCO
- TCO dimensions: W between 1.1 and 1.2m H will depends on roof penetration (something like membrane to membrane - 0.7m)
- Bob Flight is a potential candidate after the reviews (~December)
Roof penetration locations
- Detector support structure interference
- -> Jack
- Instrumentation feedthrus
- HV feed thru
- Detector readout feed thru
Cable routing to the feedthroughs --> cable_page
There are two options for reading out the lower APA:
- Either the cables are routed up through the upper APA
- Along the floor and up the wall.
The floor option changes the number and location of the feedthrus. There are also grounding implications.
- Prototyping could be useful (trial at Ash River? The APA frame will get there between 7th-14th)
- The info is from Lee
- -> Jim will set up a meeting with Roxanne/Marvin/Ron and Matt/Lee and Dave from photon to start the discussion
- ->Need this around Xmass for final decision in mid-January
Floor loading
The floor loading will probably be defined by the areal lift needed to reach the roof. A draft of the installation proceed needs revised and then the equipment at each step listed.
Main Steps are:
Installation of the detector support structure Installation of cryogenic piping, Detector installation.
I added info on the areal lift on the installation page.
- -> Where is the info?
- -> Who?
2. Underground space
Plan for the work flow
Understand the test required on the APA. Horizontal or Vertical.
Understand the work flow (row by row? section by section?)
- -> Where is the info?
- -> Who?
Ross Cage Design
Bill's proposal: docdb entry
- -> Bill
Random information and questions
- If we make the cage tall enough to fit the APA crate inside, the excavation equipment for CF may not fit inside because the cage reduces maximum width by ~4” (100 mm) as compared to a slung load
- Making the cage taller also makes it heavier, reducing the weight capacity for both slung and cage loads
- Can we do to the Yates shaft for some items? Boundary conditions.
