Difference between revisions of "Installation and Integration/ActionItems"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (22 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==1. Cryostat design == | ==1. Cryostat design == | ||
| − | + | ===TCO interface=== | |
| − | + | * List of the components using the TCO | |
| + | **'''-> Where is the info?''' | ||
| + | **'''-> Who?''' | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | Detector support structure interference | + | |
| − | : | + | * Space inside needed to close the TCO |
| − | + | ||
| + | * TCO dimensions: W between 1.1 and 1.2m H will depends on roof penetration (something like membrane to membrane - 0.7m) | ||
| + | * Bob Flight is a potential candidate after the reviews (~December) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Roof penetration locations=== | ||
| + | *Detector support structure interference | ||
| + | *''' -> Jack''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Instrumentation feedthrus | ||
| + | |||
| + | * HV feed thru | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Detector readout feed thru | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Cable routing to the feedthroughs --> [https://dune.bnl.gov/wiki/Installation_and_Integration/ActionItems/Cables cable_page]=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | There are two options for reading out the lower APA: | ||
| + | * Either the cables are routed up through the upper APA | ||
| + | * Along the floor and up the wall. | ||
| + | The floor option changes the number and location of the feedthrus. There are also grounding implications. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Prototyping could be useful (trial at Ash River? The APA frame will get there between 7th-14th) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *'''The info is from Lee''' | ||
| + | *'''-> Jim will set up a meeting with Roxanne/Marvin/Ron and Matt/Lee and Dave from photon to start the discussion''' | ||
| + | *'''->Need this around Xmass for final decision in mid-January''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Floor loading=== | ||
| + | The floor loading will probably be defined by the areal lift needed to reach the roof. A draft of the installation proceed needs revised and then the equipment at each step listed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Main Steps are: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Installation of the detector support structure | ||
| + | Installation of cryogenic piping, | ||
| + | Detector installation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I added info on the areal lift on the installation page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *'''-> Where is the info?''' | ||
| + | *'''-> Who?''' | ||
==2. Underground space == | ==2. Underground space == | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Plan for the work flow === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Understand the test required on the APA. Horizontal or Vertical. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Understand the work flow (row by row? section by section?) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *'''-> Where is the info?''' | ||
| + | *'''-> Who?''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Ross Cage Design === | ||
| + | Bill's proposal: [http://docs.dunescience.org:8080/cgi-bin/RetrieveFile?docid=1871&filename=Cage%20Parameters_FD_25OCT2016.pdf&version=1 docdb entry] | ||
| + | *'''-> Bill''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Random information and questions === | ||
| + | * If we make the cage tall enough to fit the APA crate inside, the excavation equipment for CF may not fit inside because the cage reduces maximum width by ~4” (100 mm) as compared to a slung load | ||
| + | * Making the cage taller also makes it heavier, reducing the weight capacity for both slung and cage loads | ||
| + | * Can we do to the Yates shaft for some items? Boundary conditions. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:47, 7 November 2016
Action Items for the Installation and Integration group
1. Cryostat design
TCO interface
- List of the components using the TCO
- -> Where is the info?
- -> Who?
- Space inside needed to close the TCO
- TCO dimensions: W between 1.1 and 1.2m H will depends on roof penetration (something like membrane to membrane - 0.7m)
- Bob Flight is a potential candidate after the reviews (~December)
Roof penetration locations
- Detector support structure interference
- -> Jack
- Instrumentation feedthrus
- HV feed thru
- Detector readout feed thru
Cable routing to the feedthroughs --> cable_page
There are two options for reading out the lower APA:
- Either the cables are routed up through the upper APA
- Along the floor and up the wall.
The floor option changes the number and location of the feedthrus. There are also grounding implications.
- Prototyping could be useful (trial at Ash River? The APA frame will get there between 7th-14th)
- The info is from Lee
- -> Jim will set up a meeting with Roxanne/Marvin/Ron and Matt/Lee and Dave from photon to start the discussion
- ->Need this around Xmass for final decision in mid-January
Floor loading
The floor loading will probably be defined by the areal lift needed to reach the roof. A draft of the installation proceed needs revised and then the equipment at each step listed.
Main Steps are:
Installation of the detector support structure Installation of cryogenic piping, Detector installation.
I added info on the areal lift on the installation page.
- -> Where is the info?
- -> Who?
2. Underground space
Plan for the work flow
Understand the test required on the APA. Horizontal or Vertical.
Understand the work flow (row by row? section by section?)
- -> Where is the info?
- -> Who?
Ross Cage Design
Bill's proposal: docdb entry
- -> Bill
Random information and questions
- If we make the cage tall enough to fit the APA crate inside, the excavation equipment for CF may not fit inside because the cage reduces maximum width by ~4” (100 mm) as compared to a slung load
- Making the cage taller also makes it heavier, reducing the weight capacity for both slung and cage loads
- Can we do to the Yates shaft for some items? Boundary conditions.
