Difference between revisions of "Installation and Integration/ActionItems"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==2. Underground space == | ==2. Underground space == | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Plan for the work flow === | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Ross Cage Design === | ||
| + | Bill's proposal: [[http://docs.dunescience.org:8080/cgi-bin/RetrieveFile?docid=1871&filename=Cage%20Parameters_FD_25OCT2016.pdf&version=1]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Random information and questions === | ||
| + | * If we make the cage tall enough to fit the APA crate inside, the excavation equipment for CF may not fit inside because the cage reduces maximum width by ~4” (100 mm) as compared to a slung load | ||
| + | * Making the cage taller also makes it heavier, reducing the weight capacity for both slung and cage loads | ||
| + | * Can we do to the Yates shaft for some items? Boundary conditions. | ||
Revision as of 13:20, 26 October 2016
Action Items for the Installation and Integration group
1. Cryostat design
What is needed:
List of the components using the TCO
- -> Who?
Roof penetration locations
- Detector support structure interference
- -> Jack
Cable routing to the feedthroughs
- -> Who?
Floor loading
- -> Who?
2. Underground space
Plan for the work flow
Ross Cage Design
Bill's proposal: [[1]]
Random information and questions
- If we make the cage tall enough to fit the APA crate inside, the excavation equipment for CF may not fit inside because the cage reduces maximum width by ~4” (100 mm) as compared to a slung load
- Making the cage taller also makes it heavier, reducing the weight capacity for both slung and cage loads
- Can we do to the Yates shaft for some items? Boundary conditions.
