Difference between revisions of "Installation and Integration/ActionItems"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JimStewart (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==1. Cryostat design == | ==1. Cryostat design == | ||
+ | ===TCO interface=== | ||
− | + | * List of the components using the TCO | |
− | *'''-> Where is the info?''' | + | **'''-> Where is the info?''' |
− | *'''-> Who?''' | + | **'''-> Who?''' |
+ | |||
+ | * TCO dimensions | ||
===Roof penetration locations=== | ===Roof penetration locations=== |
Revision as of 00:34, 27 October 2016
Action Items for the Installation and Integration group
1. Cryostat design
TCO interface
- List of the components using the TCO
- -> Where is the info?
- -> Who?
- TCO dimensions
Roof penetration locations
- Detector support structure interference
- -> Jack
Cable routing to the feedthroughs
- -> Where is the info?
- -> Who?
Floor loading
- -> Where is the info?
- -> Who?
2. Underground space
Plan for the work flow
- -> Where is the info?
- -> Who?
Ross Cage Design
Bill's proposal: docdb entry
- -> Bill
Random information and questions
- If we make the cage tall enough to fit the APA crate inside, the excavation equipment for CF may not fit inside because the cage reduces maximum width by ~4” (100 mm) as compared to a slung load
- Making the cage taller also makes it heavier, reducing the weight capacity for both slung and cage loads
- Can we do to the Yates shaft for some items? Boundary conditions.